WHITEPAPER
Step-by-step to choose your perfect authoring tool
October 28, 2026
CONTENT CREATED BY:

Table of contents
Formal education is the institutionalized, planned and officially recognized system of instruction that follows a defined curriculum, organizes learning into successive levels, and ends with a degree or certificate that carries official validity.
It’s delivered in schools, high schools, vocational training centers and universities, whether in person, online or in a hybrid format. Its defining feature isn’t the place or the format, but accreditation: only what an education authority or an accredited body recognizes as such counts as formal education.
That boundary matters more than it seems. In business, “formal training” gets used for any structured course, but strictly speaking most corporate training isn’t formal education: it’s non-formal education. We get concrete about it further down.
The five traits that define it, in short:
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Setting | Official or accredited educational institutions |
| Structure | Curriculum, levels and programs defined in advance |
| Regulation | Each country’s educational standards and rules |
| Outcomes | Degrees, certificates or diplomas with official validity |
| Formats | In person, online or hybrid |
| Duration | Full academic terms, from months to several years |
| Assessment | Mandatory and regulated, with public criteria |
When someone asks “how far does formal education go?”, the answer isn’t a matter of opinion: there’s an official framework that organizes it. It’s the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED), adopted by UNESCO’s General Conference in November 2011.
ISCED divides education into nine levels, from 0 to 8, and it’s the reference used by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics, the OECD and Eurostat so that figures from different countries can be compared. This is how those levels map onto the U.S. system:
| ISCED level | Name | Typical U.S. equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Early childhood education | Pre-K and kindergarten |
| 1 | Primary education | Elementary school |
| 2 | Lower secondary education | Middle school or junior high |
| 3 | Upper secondary education | High school |
| 4 | Post-secondary non-tertiary education | Certificate and bridge programs |
| 5 | Short-cycle tertiary education | Associate degree |
| 6 | Bachelor’s or equivalent level | Bachelor’s degree |
| 7 | Master’s or equivalent level | Master’s degree |
| 8 | Doctoral or equivalent level | Doctorate |
There’s one detail of ISCED that almost never gets mentioned and that clears up the confusion between the three types of education in one stroke: the classification covers formal and non-formal education, but leaves informal education out. Why? Because informal education isn’t institutionalized, so there’s no program to classify and no certification to record.
In other words: the difference between formal and non-formal is one of regulation and official recognition, not of quality or rigor. A well-designed upskilling path can be more demanding than a university course and still not be formal education.
Formal education is organized into successive stages, each with its own entry requirements and its own credential:
Across all these stages different learning styles coexist, and the delivery format —in person, online or blended— has stopped being a distinguishing trait: today there are fully online degrees that are every bit as formal as their on-campus counterparts.
Some common examples:
They all share the same four pieces: an approved program, a schedule, a regulated assessment and a credential at the end. If any one of them is missing, it’s no longer formal education.
Formal education plays a role no other model can fully replace, and it’s worth separating its two sides.
On the educational side, it allows you to:
On the professional side, it provides:
What has changed is its exclusivity. A degree still opens the door, but it no longer guarantees that the competencies behind it are still current five years later. That’s why lifelong learning has become the natural complement to formal education, not its alternative.
There are three broad ways of learning, and understanding where the boundary lies prevents most of the misunderstandings that come up when designing a training plan:
| Type of education | What it looks like | Where it happens |
|---|---|---|
| Formal | Structured, regulated and assessed | Official or accredited institutions |
| Non-formal | Planned and flexible, but without official regulation | Company courses, workshops, e-learning |
| Informal | Spontaneous, unplanned | Work, experience, conversations |
This is the question that comes up most often in L&D teams, and the answer is slightly uncomfortable: most of what a company trains isn’t formal education. Which doesn’t make it worth less—it just means it plays in a different category.
The test is simple. Ask yourself whether the credential you hand out is recognized by an education authority or by an accredited body outside your company. If the answer is no, it’s non-formal training, however structured it may be.
| Training initiative | Is it formal education? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Registered apprenticeship with a technical college | Yes | The learner earns an official credential |
| Degree program run with a university | Yes | It’s awarded by an accredited institution |
| State-issued occupational license | Yes | It sits in the official qualifications framework |
| Vendor certification from a tech provider | No, but it accredits | Industry recognition, not government recognition |
| Internal onboarding plan | No | Non-formal training, with no external validity |
| Skills path in the LMS | No | Non-formal training, with an in-house certificate |
| Learning from a colleague on the job | No | That’s informal learning |
Talking only about its strengths leaves half the picture out, and it’s precisely in its limits that you see why it needs to be complemented.
What it does well:
Where it falls short:
That’s why the combination works better than either one alone: formal education provides the base and the accreditation; microlearning, the learning pill and blended learning provide the speed and the application. Continuing education units (CEUs) were created precisely to measure that middle ground.
Formal education is still the foundation of academic and professional development, but today it has to be complemented with more flexible learning that’s applicable on the job. Combining formal, non-formal and informal education builds not just theoretical knowledge, but skills people can use from day one.
For many organizations that balance is a challenge: they need to keep structured, certifiable paths while also offering dynamic, up-to-date experiences available from any device. That’s where a learning platform makes the difference.
With isEazy LMS you can bring that whole ecosystem into a single environment:
Formal education is the institutionalized, regulated and accredited learning that ISCED 2011 organizes into nine levels, from 0 to 8. What sets it apart from non-formal and informal education is one single thing: official recognition of the credential. It provides a base, depth and verifiable accreditation, but it moves slowly, treats everyone the same and leaves little room for immediate practice. That’s why the useful question is no longer whether a company should bet on formal education or on internal training, but how to fit both into the same path.
In practice, that fit is a tooling problem. When official degrees, industry certifications and internal training live in different systems, nobody has the full picture of what the workforce actually knows. isEazy LMS brings learning paths, assessments, certificates and analytics together in one environment, so you can build on the base your people already have instead of starting from scratch. Want to see it applied to your organization? Request a demo.
Formal education is a structured and regulated teaching process provided by official institutions. It follows a defined curriculum with clear goals, content, assessments, and educational levels (primary, secondary, vocational, and higher education). Its main characteristic is that it leads to a recognized certificate or degree, validated by educational authorities or accreditation bodies. It can be delivered in-person, online, or through a hybrid format — always within a framework that ensures quality standards. It’s the most traditional model and serves as the foundation of the educational system.
The main goal is to provide a solid and progressive academic foundation that helps individuals acquire essential knowledge, skills, and competencies for their personal and professional lives. It ensures basic learning, promotes critical thinking, enables access to higher education, and officially validates a person’s capabilities.
The main types include early childhood education (depending on the country), primary education, secondary education, upper secondary or high school, regulated vocational training, and higher education (undergraduate, master’s, doctorate). Each level follows a structured program and grants official certifications upon completion.
Formal education is structured, regulated, and certified, while non-formal education is flexible, practical, and focused on developing specific skills, often without official recognition. Formal education happens in educational institutions and follows a defined plan; non-formal education takes place in workshops, short courses, or corporate training programs and adapts to specific needs.
Formal education follows an official curriculum and results in recognized certifications, while informal education occurs spontaneously, without set objectives or official recognition. Informal learning comes from daily experiences, work, social interaction, or self-discovery, complementing formal education with practical knowledge.
Because it validates knowledge through official degrees, opens doors to better opportunities, adds professional credibility, and provides the theoretical base required for technical or specialized roles. It also complements hands-on experience and supports the development of a strong, recognized career path.
Because combining them helps build well-rounded professionals: formal training provides deep, structured knowledge, while non-formal learning delivers agility, continuous updates, and practical skills tailored to the market’s demands. Together, they foster continuous learning, improve performance, and support adaptability in the face of organizational challenges.
Discover the No.1 authoring tool on the market
Try it freeRequest a demo
