CASE STUDY
How MAPFRE turned learning into sales with isEazy
STUDY
Download the free study, developed in collaboration with Microsoft, and discover the insights.
Calculate how much time and money you can save by creating courses with AI Autopilot.
Stay up to date with all our latest news
Subscribe to our newsletter Stay up to date with all our latest news
May 7, 2026
CONTENT CREATED BY:

Table of contents
Online training models are the different ways a company can structure and distribute its digital learning: from uploading content to an intranet to deploying a full LMS with individual progress tracking. Choosing the right model determines the effectiveness of learning, the cost and the scalability of the training programme.
Technology has radically transformed the way companies train their teams. But digitising training is not just a change of format: it means rethinking the learning strategy, the available technological resources and the profile of the employees who will be learning. Before choosing a model, it is worth asking the right questions.
Online training is not just a response to the pandemic: it is the natural evolution of how teams learn in distributed and fast-changing work environments. According to LinkedIn Learning’s Workplace Learning Report 2024, 90% of organisations are concerned about talent retention, and continuous learning is the second most valued factor by employees when deciding whether to stay at a company.
Moreover, according to the Brandon Hall Group, companies that implement e-learning reduce the time spent on training by 40–60% and achieve 25–60% higher knowledge retention compared to face-to-face training.
There is no universally better online training model. What works for a retail company with 500 stores may not be right for a 50-person law firm. Ask yourself these four questions before deciding:
Identifying the objective is the first step. Do you need to reduce the cost of face-to-face training? Do you want to reach geographically dispersed employees? Are you looking to improve course completion rates? Each motivation points to a different model: an LMS is ideal if you need traceability, while webinars are sufficient if you simply want to share occasional updates.
Some models require more infrastructure than others. Distributing content on an existing intranet may have minimal cost, but deploying an LMS requires a platform, integration with HR systems and, in many cases, a virtual trainer to manage the platform. Honestly assess your team’s resources before committing to a model you may not be able to sustain.
The type of content determines the model. Onboarding processes benefit especially from the LMS model with individual tracking. Product training fits well with microlearning in webinar format or short in-app content. Complex technical training usually requires a blended model combining hands-on practice with digital theory.
The model you choose must be sustainable for the team that will run it. If your trainers have no experience with digital tools, an overly sophisticated model may generate resistance. Prioritise intuitive tools that allow anyone to create quality content without advanced technical knowledge.
These are the four most widespread models in the corporate world, with their characteristics, advantages, limitations and when to use them:
This is the simplest model: it involves uploading training materials (PDFs, videos, presentations) to a corporate intranet or website so employees can access them on demand. It requires no specific platform or complex technical integration.
When to use it: when the goal is simply to make knowledge available and you do not need to measure individual progress. Ideal for internal documentation, reference guides or occasional consultation materials.
Advantages: low implementation cost, easy to maintain, accessible to any employee with access to the corporate network.
Limitations: no traceability, no assessment, no centralised learning management. If you need to convert your materials into an LMS-compatible e-learning format, you can easily create a SCORM from a PDF with the right tools.
An LMS (Learning Management System) is the most comprehensive option for managing corporate training. It allows you to create, distribute, track and evaluate courses from a single system, with automatic reporting and role-based access for each employee profile.
When to use it: when you need structured, mandatory or assessed training. Ideal for onboarding, regulatory compliance, internal certifications or large-scale skills development programmes.
Advantages: full learning traceability, SCORM content reuse, itinerary automation, reports by employee/team/area, HR system integration.
Limitations: requires an initial investment in both the platform and the creation of structured content. The adoption curve may be steeper if teams are not used to digital tools.
With isEazy Author you can create e-learning courses without technical knowledge and distribute them directly in an LMS.
Blended learning combines e-learning with face-to-face or synchronous sessions. When well designed, the digital and in-person components complement and reinforce each other.
When to use it: when the content requires hands-on practice that cannot be fully digitised, such as communication skills, leadership, sales or technical training with a practical component. Our guide on what blended learning is explains how to structure an effective hybrid programme.
Advantages: combines the flexibility of e-learning with the impact of human interaction; improves employee satisfaction; allows the most complex concepts learned online to be reinforced in person.
Limitations: higher logistical cost than pure e-learning; requires coordination between the digital and in-person parts; if they are not integrated, the outcome can be worse than either model on its own.
Webinars are live (or on-demand) training sessions delivered via video conference. They allow a large number of people to connect simultaneously, run real-time demonstrations and answer questions live.
When to use them: for product launches, regulatory updates, company announcements or one-off training sessions that do not require individual assessment or tracking. See our guide on webinars in corporate training to get the most out of this format.
Advantages: immediacy, real-time interaction, low cost per participant, easy to organise with standard tools.
Limitations: lower interactivity than asynchronous e-learning; no individual traceability; knowledge is not structured for future reference.
| Model | When to use it | Recommended isEazy tool |
|---|---|---|
| Website / Intranet | Internal documentation, reference materials without tracking | isEazy Author |
| LMS | Onboarding, compliance, certifications, structured programmes | isEazy LMS + isEazy Author |
| Blended | Skills with a practical component, leadership and talent programmes | isEazy LMS + isEazy Skills |
| Webinars | Launches, one-off updates, large audiences without assessment | Video conferencing integrated with LMS |
There is no single answer, but there are objective criteria that can guide the decision:
In most mid-sized and large companies, the most effective long-term model is to combine an LMS as the core of the training ecosystem with high-quality e-learning content created internally, supplemented by occasional webinars or face-to-face sessions depending on the type of training.
Whatever model you choose, content accessibility is an increasingly demanded requirement — both from a regulatory standpoint and as a genuine commitment to inclusion in the workplace. E-learning content must be usable by people with functional diversity: visual, auditory, motor or cognitive.
This means including subtitles in videos, alternative text for images, keyboard navigation and adequate colour contrast ratios. If you are starting to work on this, our guide on how to create accessible e-learning content is the ideal starting point.
When the volume of content to be created is high and internal teams do not have the capacity to handle it, many companies opt for a Content Factory model: an outsourced or hybrid production structure that enables e-learning content to be generated at scale, with quality control and optimised production timelines.
It is a particularly suitable model for companies that need to digitise a large training catalogue quickly, or that have a constant flow of new content — product updates, regulatory changes, new hires — that needs to be turned into training materials efficiently. With isEazy Factory, content production is handled end-to-end by a specialist team.
MAPFRE is a good example of how a well-structured online training model can transform the impact of learning on business results. With isEazy, MAPFRE transformed its sales learning, directly connecting team training with business objectives. Discover how they did it →
Choosing an online training model is not just a technical decision, but a strategic one. The best model is the one that adapts to the reality of your team, the type of content you need to develop, and the resources you have to maintain it over time.
In this process, isEazy Author allows you to create, update, and scale e-learning content internally, efficiently and with greater autonomy. But when production volume grows, deadlines shorten, or the internal team can’t handle all the work, isEazy Factory enables you to outsource or strengthen content creation with a model designed to produce at scale, maintain quality, and optimize timelines.
In this way, you can combine internal autonomy and external production capacity according to the needs of each moment, building a sustainable, flexible e-learning ecosystem that is ready to grow with your organization.
For an SME with limited resources, the most recommended model is usually LMS-based training combined with e-learning content. This combination allows all training to be centralised in a single system, employee progress to be tracked automatically, and content to be reused without spending extra time recreating it. A tool like isEazy Author makes it easy to create courses without technical knowledge, while an LMS like isEazy LMS allows those courses to be managed and distributed from day one.
The main difference lies in the level of management and traceability. Distributing content on a website or intranet gives employees access to materials, but provides no progress tracking, assessments or automatic reports. An LMS, on the other hand, centralises the entire training cycle — from content distribution to assessment and results analysis. If you need to know who has completed what, with what result and in how much time, an LMS is the essential option.
The cost depends on the model chosen and the tools used. Distributing content on an existing intranet can have very low cost, but limits tracking. An LMS may involve a monthly or annual investment depending on the platform, though there are accessible options for companies of any size. In general, e-learning represents significant savings compared to face-to-face training: according to the Brandon Hall Group, companies that adopt e-learning reduce the time spent on training by 40–60% and achieve 25–60% higher knowledge retention.
Yes — in fact, this is the most common practice in companies with mature training programmes. The most typical combination is LMS (for structured, mandatory training) with webinars (for live update sessions) and blended learning (for programmes that require face-to-face practice). The key is to define which model best fits each need before designing the training plan.
WEBINAR ONDEMAND
Discover how artificial intelligence can become your main ally in the creation of your e-learning courses.
Watch recording