CASE STUDY
How Pepco was able to comprehensively manage employee training with an LMS
STUDY
Download the free study, developed in collaboration with Microsoft, and discover the insights.
Stay up to date with all our latest news
Subscribe to our newsletter Stay up to date with all our latest news
April 23, 2026
CONTENT CREATED BY:

Table of contents
If your company manages certifications, compliance programmes or onboarding assessments through an online learning platform, you have likely wondered at some point how to ensure those tests are truly reliable. The answer lies in proctoring in e-learning: the technology that enables remote supervision of online assessments and guarantees their integrity without requiring physical presence.
The term proctoring comes from the verb to proctor, meaning to supervise. In the context of e-learning, it refers to the set of technologies and procedures that allow monitoring and verifying the integrity of an exam or assessment carried out in a digital environment.
Unlike the academic context —where proctoring is used mainly to prevent fraud in university certifications—, in the corporate environment its function is broader: to validate that employees who pass an assessment have genuinely acquired the required competencies, whether during an onboarding process, an upskilling programme or a mandatory compliance certification.
A proctoring system acts as a digital supervisor that, without interfering with the test-taker’s experience, monitors in real time or through recording what happens during the assessment: who is in front of the camera, whether any unauthorised materials are visible, and whether the behaviour is consistent with someone sitting an exam legitimately.
A modern proctoring system combines several technological layers that operate simultaneously during the assessment:
Not all assessment contexts require the same level of supervision. Before choosing a solution, it is worth understanding which modalities exist and which situation each one fits best:
| Type | How it works | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Automated proctoring | AI analyses recordings and behaviour without real-time human intervention. Generates automatic alerts for later review. | High-volume onboarding assessments, compliance tests with large numbers of employees. |
| Live proctoring | A human supervisor observes the test-taker in real time via video call. Can intervene if irregularities are detected. | High-value certifications, professional accreditation exams, personnel selection. |
| Hybrid proctoring | Combination of AI for automatic analysis and human review only for cases flagged as suspicious. | Upskilling programmes, internal certifications with career progression implications. |
| Record & Review proctoring | The session is recorded and reviewed afterwards by a human specialist or AI. | When real-time supervision is not possible but evidence is required for potential auditing. |
In an environment where more and more companies manage employee training through digital platforms, the credibility of online assessments becomes a strategic asset. Without proctoring, a certification obtained in an LMS may carry far less weight than one achieved in person, both for the company and for the employee themselves.
These are the scenarios where proctoring adds the most value in the L&D context:
Integrating proctoring into your corporate training strategy requires more than just choosing a tool. Here are the five steps that ensure a successful implementation:
Not every test justifies the cost and friction of proctoring. The first step is to identify which assessments have a real impact on business decisions: mandatory compliance certifications, accreditation tests with curricular value, or assessments that determine access to roles or compensation. The rest can work perfectly well without active supervision.
Cross the risk level of each assessment with the employee volume. A high-volume compliance test with a low fraud risk is well suited to automated proctoring. A high-value certification for a small number of people may justify live proctoring.
The integration must be native or via LTI. With an isEazy LMS, proctoring activates directly within the assessment activity, without the employee needing to leave the training environment.
Explain what is being monitored, why, and how data is protected. Transparency is the single biggest factor in employee acceptance of proctoring.
Define who reviews the generated alerts, within what timeframe, and with what criteria decisions about the validity of a flagged assessment are made. A clear process prevents arbitrary decisions and ensures fairness.
Pepco, the retail chain with a presence in more than 20 European countries, needed to ensure that its thousands of store employees passed product training and compliance assessments in a verifiable and standardised way across all its locations. With isEazy LMS, it centralised all training management and assessment tracking, ensuring complete result traceability across every market. Find out how they did it →
Like any technology applied to people, proctoring has both strengths and weaknesses. Understanding both is essential for a responsible implementation.
The emergence of generative AI tools has transformed the proctoring landscape in a paradoxical way: the same technology that enables assessments to be supervised with greater precision is also the one that facilitates new forms of cheating. Understanding this duality is critical for any L&D manager planning their assessment strategy.
Computer vision and natural language processing models now make it possible to detect behavioural patterns that would be invisible to a human supervisor: micro eye movements, variations in typing rhythm, changes in ambient lighting or the use of earphones. AI also allows proctoring to be scaled to thousands of simultaneous sessions without increasing the cost of human supervision.
Generative AI tools can write complete answers, produce high-quality content in seconds and, in some cases, operate in ways that are difficult for conventional proctoring systems to detect. This is why the most advanced proctoring solutions are incorporating specific capabilities to detect the use of AI during assessments.
The greatest operational advantage of proctoring lies not in the supervision tool itself, but in its integration with the learning management platform. When proctoring is connected to the LMS, it enables remote monitoring to be activated for any activity within a training programme, providing complete control over the assessment process, from participant access through to results review.
This is particularly relevant for companies with employees across multiple locations —retail, logistics, pharma— where manually coordinating supervised assessments would be unmanageable. A corporate LMS like isEazy LMS acts as the operational hub of the entire training strategy, with proctoring integration as one more layer of that ecosystem.
For companies exploring platforms with advanced automation and assessment management capabilities, it may also be useful to review the AI-powered LMS options available on the market.
isEazy LMS offers native integration with leading proctoring solutions, including Smowl, allowing L&D teams to activate assessment supervision in just a few clicks, with no additional technical development required.
Proctoring in e-learning is not merely a control tool: it is the piece that allows digital assessments to carry the same strategic weight as in-person ones. In a context where companies are investing ever more in online training, assessment integrity becomes a requirement, not an afterthought.
Implementing proctoring responsibly —with transparent communication, respect for privacy, and efficient LMS integration— turns digital certifications into credentials with real value for both the company and the employee. Tools like isEazy LMS, with its open architecture and ability to integrate with specialist partners, make this goal achievable for any L&D team, regardless of size or sector.
Yes, proctoring is legal as long as it is applied in compliance with applicable data protection regulations, such as the GDPR in Europe. The key is to inform employees in advance that they will be monitored during the assessment, obtain their explicit consent, and ensure that the collected data (image, behaviour, device activity) is handled with appropriate security measures and not retained longer than necessary. It is advisable to include the use of proctoring in the company’s privacy policy and in internal training contracts or communications.
A proctoring system can detect window or screen changes, the presence of more than one person in the camera frame, the absence of the test-taker, the use of unauthorised notes or devices, unusual eye movements, and attempts to copy text. The most advanced AI-powered systems also analyse behavioural patterns throughout the exam to detect anomalies that would be difficult to perceive manually.
When implemented transparently and proportionately, proctoring has minimal impact. The key is to communicate clearly what is and is not being monitored, and that the goal is to validate learning — not to surveil the employee. Problems arise when it is introduced without prior information or with a disproportionate level of intrusiveness, which can generate distrust within the team.
Yes, most modern proctoring solutions integrate with LMS platforms using standards such as LTI or their own APIs. This allows the LMS to automatically launch the supervised environment when accessing an assessment, with results recorded directly within the LMS. An LMS like isEazy LMS centralises both training management and assessment integrity control.
Automate processes, access 600+ ready-to-use courses, or create your own content with the help of AI.
Request a demoContact us
