ALL-IN-ONE
One platform to create, manage, and optimize your e-learning training?
STUDY
Download the free study, developed in collaboration with Microsoft, and discover the insights.
Stay up to date with all our latest news
Subscribe to our newsletter Stay up to date with all our latest news
March 27, 2026
CONTENT CREATED BY:

Table of contents
The ADKAR model is one of the most widely used change management frameworks in the business world. Developed by Prosci through the analysis of more than 700 change projects, it provides an individual and sequential roadmap that enables each person — and therefore the entire organization — to adopt and sustain transformations in a lasting way.
In this article you will find a comprehensive guide: what it is and why it matters, what it is used for, its 5 stages with a summary table, advantages and disadvantages, how to implement it step by step, real examples by sector, common mistakes, and how digital learning tools accelerate each stage.
The ADKAR model is a change management framework centered on people, not on processes or organizational structures. This sets it radically apart from other models: while approaches such as Kotter’s work at the level of leadership and collective culture, ADKAR starts from a fundamental premise — organizational change only happens when each individual changes.
It was developed by Jeff Hiatt, founder of Prosci, following the analysis of change projects in more than 700 organizations. His conclusion was that most failures were not due to technical or planning errors, but because people had not cleared one of the five necessary conditions for adopting the change.
According to Prosci’s Best Practices in Change Management Report 2023, 70% of change initiatives fail due to factors related to people — not technology or budget. ADKAR directly addresses these factors, making it the benchmark framework for HR and L&D teams responsible for leading organizational transformation.
The ADKAR model is used to diagnose, plan, and execute any type of organizational change — from the rollout of a new technology system to a cultural transformation or a merger process — ensuring that people genuinely adopt the new behaviors rather than simply being aware of them.
Its most common applications in companies include: deployment of new systems (ERP, LMS, CRM), changes in operational processes, digital transformation programs, onboarding following mergers or acquisitions, and large-scale competency development.
Each ADKAR stage is a prerequisite for the next. If a person does not clear the Awareness stage, they will not be able to develop Desire; if they lack Knowledge, they will never develop genuine Ability. Below is a summary of the five stages with their practical meaning and the signal that indicates that stage is blocked.
| ADKAR Stage | What it means in practice | Blocking signal |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness | The employee understands why the change is necessary and what risks are involved in not making it | "Why are we changing if this was already working?" — resistance narratives based on lack of information |
| Desire | The employee wants to participate in and actively support the change on a voluntary basis | Passive resistance, low attendance, lack of voluntary engagement in the process |
| Knowledge | The employee knows exactly how to implement the change in their day-to-day work and what their new role is | Frequent errors in new processes, excessive queries to managers or the team |
| Ability | The employee successfully applies new knowledge in real situations independently | They know the theory but cannot execute it alone; ongoing dependence on external support |
| Reinforcement | New behaviors are consolidated and maintained over the long term without regression | Gradual return to previous habits 2–3 months after the change was implemented |
Awareness is not simply communicating that a change is coming. It means ensuring each person understands the underlying reason: the risk of not changing, the opportunity the change represents, and how it affects them personally. Without this understanding, resistance is inevitable. Segmented internal communications by role, leadership videos explaining the “why,” and informational sessions are the key tools at this stage.
Desire is the most difficult stage to manage because it depends on personal factors — values, fears, professional interests — that vary from person to person. Leaders act here as change agents: their credibility and engagement directly influence whether teams decide to join the process. Desire cannot be forced, but it can be cultivated through mentoring, Q&A sessions with executives, and social learning content.
This is the stage where e-learning and LMS platforms take center stage. Knowledge involves providing the specific training and resources needed to understand how to implement the change in each role. The most common mistake is designing a single generic module for everyone, when different roles need different levels of knowledge. An LMS like isEazy LMS makes it possible to assign personalized learning paths by profile and track progress.
Ability is the gap between knowing and doing. Many change programs fail here because they assume that once trained, the employee is capable. Experiential learning — practice, immediate feedback, simulated scenarios — is key to closing this gap. Gamification and branching scenarios are especially effective at this stage.
Without Reinforcement, Ebbinghaus’s forgetting curve takes care of reverting the change. People tend to revert to previous habits in the absence of systematic reinforcement. Reinforcement is not a one-off event: it is a continuous system of recognition, review microlearning, dashboard-based tracking, and communication of results that demonstrates the change has been worthwhile.
Implementing ADKAR is not about following a checklist, but about building a system that accompanies each person through the five stages. Below are the key steps and the most effective tools for each one.
Before designing any action, assess which stage each employee group is blocked at. Prosci’s “ADKAR Assessment” is a diagnostic tool that assigns a score from 1 to 5 for each stage for each person. This allows you to prioritize resources and tailor the intervention rather than launching generic actions for everyone.
Each stage requires a different type of intervention. Awareness is addressed through communication; Desire, through leadership and motivation; Knowledge, through training; Ability, through practice and feedback; Reinforcement, through monitoring and recognition. Mixing these actions without respecting the sequential order is one of the most common mistakes.
Middle managers are the primary success or failure factor in ADKAR. Their involvement in the Awareness and Desire stages is decisive: they are the ones who have the individual conversation with each employee, model the desired behavior, and detect blockages before they become active resistance.
E-learning platforms and LMS are the primary support for the Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement stages. They allow you to personalize learning paths by role, measure individual progress, distribute review microlearning, and generate learning analytics to make data-driven decisions.
ADKAR is not a linear process that is executed once. Throughout the project, you must periodically re-diagnose, identify new blockages, and adjust actions. Organizations that achieve the best results are those that treat ADKAR as an iterative system, not a rigid sequence.
Learning technology is the main ally of each ADKAR stage. The goal is not to choose a generic tool, but to map which solution best addresses each step of the employee’s individual journey.
Features
Advantages
Pricing
Features
Advantages
Pricing
There are several reference frameworks for managing change. Understanding their differences helps you choose the most appropriate one depending on the type of transformation, the company’s culture, and the available timeframe.
| Model | Main focus | Ideal for |
|---|---|---|
| ADKAR (Prosci) | Individual — each person's journey through 5 sequential stages | Changes requiring individual adoption: new tools, processes, culture |
| Kotter 8 Steps | Organizational — collective urgency and transformational leadership | Large-scale cultural transformations led from the top |
| Lewin (3 Stages) | Structural — unfreeze / change / refreeze | Planned and controlled changes with a clear, defined end state |
| McKinsey 7-S | Systemic — alignment of 7 organizational elements simultaneously | Complex organizational diagnosis and redesign with multiple dimensions |
Beyond its sequential structure, the ADKAR model delivers concrete, measurable benefits to organizations that apply it rigorously. These are the most relevant ones for HR and L&D teams:
Seeing the ADKAR model in action in real contexts helps to understand how to translate each stage into specific situations. Below are four representative examples by type of change and sector, with the practical application of each stage.
| Type of change / Sector | Awareness + Desire | Knowledge + Ability + Reinforcement |
|---|---|---|
| New LMS rollout — Retail/FMCG | CEO communications on the "why"; voluntary demos with incentives for early adopters | Onboarding courses within the LMS itself; store-level pilot with feedback; usage dashboards and recognition for active teams |
| Digital transformation — Banking & insurance | Leadership sessions with digital risk data; career plans tied to new competencies | Role-based learning path; safe practice sandboxes; internal certifications and monthly adoption metrics |
| Sales model change — Distribution | Market data justifying the change; incentives linked to the new model from the start | Workshops and e-learning on techniques; call simulations; weekly reviews with public recognition |
| Post-merger onboarding — Any sector | Clear communications on the new identity; ambassadors from each company involved from day 1 | Training in merged culture, processes and tools; cross-mentoring; 30/60/90-day follow-up |
Grupo AKRON needed to train more than 700 professionals across Mexico, South America, Central America, and the United States, with very different roles and needs. Their solution was to build role-specific learning paths, combining a catalog of more than 600 courses with their own content created independently.
The result speaks for itself: a 35% increase in completion rates and half the production time. Proof that when learning is designed for each person, real change happens. View Grupo AKRON’s success story.
Knowing the most frequent pitfalls is as valuable as knowing the stages. These four mistakes appear repeatedly in organizations that try to implement ADKAR without adequate preparation.
This is the most common mistake. Managers assume the team already understands the reason for the change, but without active and structured communication, each person builds their own narrative — usually based on fear. Awareness must be explicit, multi-channel, and repeated.
Providing training does not equal developing execution capacity. An employee can complete a course on the new process and still be unable to apply it without assistance. Measuring only completion rates is insufficient: you must evaluate transfer to the job at 30, 60, and 90 days.
Many projects are considered closed when the initial training ends. Without reinforcement systems — microlearning, periodic reviews, visible recognition — regression to previous behaviors is almost inevitable within the first 90 days.
ADKAR is an individual model: different people will be at different stages at the same time. A periodic diagnostic allows you to identify where each person is blocked and act in a targeted way, rather than launching generic actions for everyone.
The difference between a successful change project and a failed one lies in execution. These six strategies concentrate the best practices of organizations with the strongest results:
Successfully implementing the ADKAR model requires more than just following the phases: you need the right tools to activate each stage of your employees’ journey. An authoring tool allows you to create interactive e-learning content for the Knowledge phase; an LMS manages distribution, tracking, and Reinforcement; and a content catalog gives your team access to training resources to develop key skills in the Ability phase. Want to have it all in one place? isEazy LMS is an all-in-one AI-powered LMS platform. Automate processes, access 600+ ready-to-use courses, or create your own content with the help of AI. All from a single platform. Request a demo and discover how isEazy can support the change you are leading in your organization.
The ADKAR model is a change management framework developed by Prosci that helps guide both individuals and organizations through the process of adapting to new ways of working or technology. ADKAR is an acronym describing five stages required for successful change: Awareness, where employees understand the need for change; Desire, which motivates employees to get involved; Knowledge, where they learn how to implement the change; Ability, to apply that knowledge in their daily tasks; and Reinforcement, which consolidates the change over the long term.
Common mistakes when implementing ADKAR include rushing through the Awareness stage without clearly communicating the need for change, underestimating the importance of motivating employees during the Desire stage, providing insufficient training during the Knowledge stage, and failing to adequately reinforce new habits during the Reinforcement stage. To avoid these mistakes, it is essential to dedicate time to each stage, provide ongoing support, and establish a long-term monitoring and communication system.
The ADKAR model differs from other change frameworks through its focus on the individual level and its five-stage structure. While Kotter’s model centers on leadership and cultural change in eight steps, and Lewin’s model on a structured three-phase transition (Unfreeze, Change, Refreeze), ADKAR focuses on people, helping them overcome resistance and develop the skills needed for change. ADKAR is ideal for changes that require individual adoption, while Kotter and Lewin may be better suited for larger-scale transformations.
To consolidate change in the Reinforcement stage, it is important to establish an incentive and recognition system — such as rewards or positive feedback — that motivates employees to maintain the new practices. It is also advisable to carry out periodic progress evaluations and continue communicating the benefits and achievements of the change. Additionally, the use of reminders and recap sessions can help new habits become an integral part of employees’ daily work.
The time needed to implement the ADKAR model varies depending on the scale of the change, the size of the organization, and the degree of internal resistance. According to Prosci, a mid-scale change project may require between 3 and 12 months to complete all stages effectively. Large-scale technological or cultural changes can extend up to 18–24 months. What matters most is not speed, but not skipping any stage: organizations that bypass the Desire or Reinforcement stages have significantly higher failure rates. A prior ADKAR assessment — evaluating each stage’s level among key employees — makes it possible to set realistic timelines and anticipate obstacles before they block progress.
Automate processes, access 600+ ready-to-use courses, or create your own content with the help of AI.
Request a demoContact us
