CASE STUDY
How Pepco transformed training using top learning tools
STUDY
Download the free study, developed in collaboration with Microsoft, and discover the insights.
Stay up to date with all our latest news
Subscribe to our newsletter Stay up to date with all our latest news
July 3, 2026
CONTENT CREATED BY:

Table of contents
87% of L&D professionals already use AI in some form at work, according to Synthesia’s AI in L&D Report 2026. Yet most corporate courses are still the same fixed content for everyone — now with a Q&A chatbot bolted on. Moving from a static course to intelligent learning is not about adding AI to what already exists. It means rethinking how training is built, distributed, and adapted to each professional.
Professionals are already used to interacting with systems like ChatGPT or Claude — tools that respond, contextualize, and personalize information instantly. Yet according to ONTSI / Red.es (2025), only 11.4% of Spanish companies with ten or more employees have integrated AI into their processes, far below the 78% of employees who already demand it in their training. The gap is mainly one of application: the technology exists, but most companies still offer the same course, the same content, and the same pace to the entire workforce.
Corporate knowledge tends to be scattered across the LMS, internal documents, and the heads of a few experts, making it difficult to reach the right person at the right moment. The result is a training model that checks a compliance box but rarely transfers to the job. If you want to dig deeper into how to apply AI to these HR and training challenges, our whitepaper on the use of AI in HR and training covers them in detail.
Before talking about a paradigm shift, it’s worth understanding what AI is already doing in L&D departments. The most widespread applications are:
For a broader view of all the ways AI can be applied to e-learning, our guide to AI applied to e-learning covers the remaining use cases with practical examples.
Most of the applications above share something in common: they are one-off functions layered on top of a course that remains, at its core, static. The real paradigm shift happens when AI stops being a complement and starts structuring the entire learning experience. At isEazy we distinguish three maturity levels:
This third level is what isEazy Brain is designed for — the native AI platform from isEazy that turns each company’s real knowledge into adaptive, contextual, and conversational learning. Brain works through three approaches: Companion personalizes and enriches structured training without compromising auditability; Adaptive diagnoses learner level and adjusts the learning path within the course itself, in line with what we covered in our article on adaptive learning; and Expert turns internal documentation into verifiable, traceable answers available to any employee the moment they need them.
| Dimension | Static course with add-on AI | isEazy Brain (training that thinks) |
|---|---|---|
| Content | Fixed for all employees | Adapts in real time to each professional's level and context |
| Knowledge | Scattered across documents or a few experts | Processed from the company's knowledge vault and actionable on demand |
| Learner support | One-off function, such as a generic chatbot | A learning agent that detects, generates, and adapts content and tone |
Pepco, a retail chain in the middle of international expansion, is a strong example of how AI-driven training enables L&D teams to scale employee learning without sacrificing pedagogical quality or multiplying workload. Find out how they did it →
Bringing AI into corporate training comes with real nuances. Employee data privacy, the risk of algorithmic bias, and natural resistance to change are genuine challenges that any strategy must address from the outset.
That is why any serious application of AI to training must maintain human oversight over the final output: AI-generated content and responses can and should be reviewed by experts before they reach the learner. This is also the approach behind isEazy Brain, which operates with per-client data isolation, full traceability, and compliance with both the GDPR and the EU AI Act — company knowledge never leaves its own environment, and is never used to train external models.
Not every attempt to bring AI into training delivers the expected results. These are the most frequent mistakes L&D teams make:
If AI-powered training is measured the same way as a traditional course, you lose precisely what makes it different: its ability to adapt and act in the moment the employee needs it. Key indicators worth tracking include:
These KPIs allow L&D teams to justify the AI investment with business data, not just tool-adoption figures.
Moving from a static course to training that thinks does not require overhauling your entire learning strategy at once. L&D teams already making progress on this path tend to follow a similar sequence:
We take a closer look at the strategic role HR plays in this process in our article on AI in human resources.
The shift from static courses to intelligent learning does not depend on budget or company size — it depends on being clear about which training problem you want to solve. AI already makes it possible to personalize, automate, and provide real-time support; the next step is turning your organization’s real knowledge into an experience that thinks alongside each professional, not just for them.
If you want to see how isEazy Brain turns your company’s corporate knowledge into adaptive, contextual, and conversational learning agents, you can request a demo and explore how it fits into your training strategy.
A course with an added AI feature is still fixed content with a one-off function bolted on, like a Q&A chatbot. Structurally applied AI, by contrast, turns corporate knowledge into an experience that adapts in real time to each professional’s moment, level, and context, instead of offering the same path to everyone.
No. Brain and AI-powered training tools are designed so that L&D teams can work with their existing documentation without programming or data science knowledge. Corporate knowledge is uploaded in common formats (PDF, Word, video, audio, SCORM, or URLs) and the platform processes it and turns it into actionable learning — always with human review before it reaches the learner.
No. AI applied to corporate training turns company knowledge into learning agents that support employees, but it does not replace internal experts, managers, or L&D teams. Its role is to enrich and personalize the learning experience, while the review, validation, and continuous improvement of content still depends on people.
Human oversight is central to any serious application of AI to training. AI-generated content and responses can be reviewed by company experts before reaching the learner, which makes it possible to maintain pedagogical quality, full traceability, and compliance with regulations such as the GDPR and the EU AI Act, without delegating the final decision entirely to the system.