CASE STUDY
How Telefónica trained its employees in new skills with a large-scale reskilling plan
STUDY
Download the free study, developed in collaboration with Microsoft, and discover the insights.
Stay up to date with all our latest news
Subscribe to our newsletter Stay up to date with all our latest news
July 20, 2026
CONTENT CREATED BY:

Table of contents
Hard skills are the technical knowledge and specialised abilities a professional needs to perform their job. They are acquired through training, practice and experience, are measurable, and can be accredited with qualifications or certificates. They form the foundation of any employee’s competency profile.
In the fields of human resources and corporate learning & development, hard skills — also known as technical skills or hard competencies — are the abilities that enable an employee to carry out the specific tasks of their role. Unlike soft skills (interpersonal skills such as communication or leadership), hard skills are directly tied to technical knowledge and are easier to assess objectively.
Their importance has grown exponentially in recent years. According to the Future of Jobs Report 2023 by the World Economic Forum, 44% of workers’ core skills will be disrupted within the next five years due to automation and artificial intelligence. This makes the continuous updating of technical skills a strategic priority for any organisation.
Taken together, hard and soft competencies are essential to building the complete professional profile of any individual. Hard skills open the door to an interview; soft skills determine whether the candidate thrives once in the role.
To better understand the difference between both types of skills, the table below summarises the key points:
| Dimension | Hard skills | Soft skills |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Technical and role-specific | Interpersonal and cross-functional |
| Acquisition | Formal training, practice, certifications | Experience, self-awareness, mindset |
| Measurement | Objective: tests, qualifications, technical assessments | Subjective: performance reviews, 360° feedback |
| Examples | Programming, data analysis, languages | Communication, leadership, adaptability |
| Shelf life | Becomes outdated (requires continuous upskilling) | More stable over time |
Although the hard skills vs. soft skills debate is often presented as a dichotomy, in practice both are complementary and inseparable. A professional with excellent hard skills but no capacity for teamwork will struggle to collaborate effectively. Similarly, someone with great interpersonal abilities but no technical grounding will be unable to execute the tasks their role demands.
The real question is not which matters more, but how to balance them. For a deeper look at this topic, read our article on hard skills vs. soft skills: which matters more?
It is also worth distinguishing between skills and competencies: skills are specific capabilities, while competencies integrate knowledge, skills and attitudes oriented towards outcomes. You can explore this distinction further in our article on skills vs. competencies: key differences.
The list of most sought-after technical skills varies by industry and role, but certain cross-functional competencies are required across virtually every sector. Below are the most relevant, grouped by area:
In the world of HR and L&D, hard skills are not managed in isolation: they are part of a broader talent management ecosystem. Understanding how they fit in is fundamental to designing effective development strategies.
The first step is mapping the technical skills that already exist within the organisation. A competency matrix is an essential tool for this: it makes it possible to visualise which hard skills each employee and team possesses, identify gaps and make informed decisions about training, promotion and hiring.
Once gaps have been identified, skills management comes into play: the systematic management of skills development aligned with the organisation’s strategic objectives. Within this framework, hard skills and soft skills are planned together — not in isolation.
This approach is especially relevant in a context where 50% of workers worldwide will need to acquire new technical skills to meet the demands of digital transformation (World Economic Forum, 2023). Organisations that anticipate these needs with structured upskilling and reskilling plans will be best placed to navigate change.
Developing hard skills within an organisation requires a systematic approach. Here are the key recommendations for HR and L&D teams:
Conduct a skills gap analysis comparing your teams’ current technical skills with those required for their roles now and in the future. This diagnosis is the starting point of any effective training plan. Tools such as a competency matrix make this process significantly more manageable.
An effective hard skills training programme combines structured theory with deliberate practice. In this respect, microlearning is especially well suited to technical skills development: it distributes learning into consumable units, improves long-term retention and fits naturally into employees’ working routines.
Other methodologies that work well for hard skills development include project-based learning (PBL), simulations and on-the-job training.
Technical skills are the foundation, but they are not sufficient on their own. For an employee to apply their technical knowledge effectively, they also need competencies such as problem-solving, communication and critical thinking. The best corporate training programmes integrate both types of skills into a coherent development plan.
Telefónica Spain is a prime example of how a large organisation can tackle reskilling and technical skills development at scale. Working with isEazy, they implemented a training programme that allowed them to optimise their learning processes and reach thousands of employees with content tailored to their actual needs. Discover how they did it →
Hard skills are the technical foundation of professional performance. Keeping them continuously up to date is therefore essential for organizational resilience in a labor market being reshaped by automation and artificial intelligence.
In this context, the challenge for HR and L&D teams is to anticipate future needs through a talent strategy that combines skills gap analysis, training planning, and effective tools such as isEazy Skills. With an up-to-date catalog covering today’s most in-demand skills—from digital and AI competencies to languages and project management—this platform provides interactive, accessible courses available on demand that maximize engagement and ensure that learning is transferred directly to the workplace.
Strengthen your organization’s technical talent today and request a free demo of isEazy Skills.
Hard skills are concrete, measurable technical abilities — such as software proficiency, a foreign language, or programming. Professional competencies are a broader concept: they integrate knowledge (hard skills), practical abilities, and attitudes or behaviours (soft skills). In other words, a competency encompasses the technical “know-how” alongside the “know-how-to-be” and the motivation to apply it. In modern talent management, HR departments tend to speak of competencies because they allow employees to be assessed more holistically, beyond titles or certifications.
Absolutely. Contrary to what was once believed, neuroscience has shown that the adult brain retains its plasticity and is capable of acquiring new technical knowledge throughout an entire working life. The key lies in the methodology: combining structured learning with deliberate, spaced practice significantly improves retention. Strategies such as microlearning, project-based learning and social learning are particularly effective for developing hard skills in corporate environments.
It depends on the complexity of the skill and the learner’s starting point, but research on deliberate practice suggests that between 20 and 100 hours of focused effort are needed to reach a functional level in a new technical skill. To reach expert level, the most widely cited reference in the literature is the 10,000-hour rule proposed by Anders Ericsson. In corporate training, the goal is not absolute mastery but rather achieving the level of competence required to perform the role effectively.
Companies have several methods available to assess their teams’ hard skills. The most common include: technical tests or knowledge assessments, industry-recognised external certifications, performance evaluations based on quantifiable outcomes, and skills assessment tools integrated into learning management systems (LMS) or talent platforms. A competency matrix is particularly useful because it provides an aggregated view of each team’s strengths and skill gaps, enabling more informed decisions about training, promotion and internal mobility.